|
|
Post by Bard on Mar 8, 2017 12:31:21 GMT
I'm probably late, but I just found someone beating the currently biggest listed nuke in the chart, coming in at 10.1 Megatons. I'd format it like the chart shows, but that's a pain to do on a cell phone, so I'll provide a link instead. Don't mean to one-up-man but mine's bigger and costs less...  |
|
|
|
Post by dwwolf on Mar 8, 2017 12:38:12 GMT
Better......but you can do 1.6 MT in 200 kg.
So you get 9.6 MT for 1200 kg.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bard on Mar 8, 2017 12:49:49 GMT
Better......but you can do 1.6 MT in 200 kg. So you get 9.6 MT for 1200 kg. PS Not sure what you mean. My design is 20x less in mass, is half the price, and is more powerful than other big nuke... |
|
|
|
Post by dwwolf on Mar 8, 2017 13:32:11 GMT
6x 1.6 MT in one missile.
|
|
|
|
Post by Enderminion on Mar 8, 2017 14:11:36 GMT
these new nukes mass 4x as much as the 9.64 for a piddling increase in yield
|
|
bard
New Member
Posts: 4 
|
Post by bard on Mar 8, 2017 14:39:27 GMT
Not since the update. Best I've personally gotten was 10.2 Mt out of a plutonium boosted fission nuke. You can do 10.4 out of a U-235 nuke but I haven't been able to get higher than that either. I think they should boost the core mass limit to 10 tons or more from 1 ton to allow for larger nukes. Imo you are better off just massing cheap 9.64Mt nukes though (you can also get 10.2 Mt out of U-233 which is cheaper using osmium reflector and the same principle but quadrouple the mass and an extra 90kc doesn't seem worth it).  Forget mine. Nevermind, this one is .5 Mc cheaper and .1 Mt more, same size. Credit jasonvance Edit:Still works. |
|
|
|
Post by Enderminion on Mar 10, 2017 12:52:15 GMT
I found this nuke on the steam forums, attributed to someone by the username "Staalby" it is a 10.1Mt nuclear weapon which masses less then the 9.64Mt bomb already up there, it costs 3-4x as much though  I prepose we call this the Staalby bomb after the creator |
|
|
|
Post by The Astronomer on Mar 10, 2017 13:10:31 GMT
I found this nuke on the steam forums, attributed to someone by the username "Staalby" it is a 10.1Mt nuclear weapon which masses less then the 9.64Mt bomb already up there, it costs 3-4x as much though I prepose we call this the Staalby bomb after the creator PUSH THIS TO THE TOP OF THE SCORE An important note: I managed to pump in some 210 kg/m 3 of Deuterium-Tritium inside it. Its mass went up by 20 kg as explosion power went up by 100 kt. |
|
|
|
Post by Enderminion on Mar 10, 2017 13:25:37 GMT
I forgot the 0.1 I could add was a 100K tons
|
|
|
|
Post by vegemeister on Mar 10, 2017 15:03:31 GMT
Can also save some mass by switching the reflector to UHMWPE.
|
|
|
|
Post by Inglonias on Mar 12, 2017 1:58:35 GMT
I appear to have a pretty nice large yield warhead here by messing around with the sliders.
[tr]
[td style="border:1px solid #bbb;padding: 5px;"]---[/td]
[td style="border:1px solid #bbb;padding: 5px;"]@Inglonias[/td]
[td style="border:1px solid #bbb;padding: 5px;"]8.35Mt[/td]
[td style="border:1px solid #bbb;padding: 5px;"]599 kc[/td]
[td style="border:1px solid #bbb;padding: 5px;"]1.66tkg[/td]
[td style="border:1px solid #bbb;padding: 5px;"][a href="http://images.akamai.steamusercontent.com/ugc/159154925377268933/D4DBC7315852F81A530B1339578D9D0DA6BC3FC3//"]Steam Screenshot[/a][/td]
[td style="border:1px solid #bbb;padding: 5px;"]---[/td]
[/tr]
 |
|
|
|
Post by The Astronomer on Mar 12, 2017 11:37:16 GMT
I appear to have a pretty nice large yield warhead here by messing around with the sliders.
[tr]
[td style="border:1px solid #bbb;padding: 5px;"]---[/td]
[td style="border:1px solid #bbb;padding: 5px;"]@Inglonias[/td]
[td style="border:1px solid #bbb;padding: 5px;"]8.35Mt[/td]
[td style="border:1px solid #bbb;padding: 5px;"]599 kc[/td]
[td style="border:1px solid #bbb;padding: 5px;"]1.66tkg[/td]
[td style="border:1px solid #bbb;padding: 5px;"][a href="http://images.akamai.steamusercontent.com/ugc/159154925377268933/D4DBC7315852F81A530B1339578D9D0DA6BC3FC3//"]Steam Screenshot[/a][/td]
[td style="border:1px solid #bbb;padding: 5px;"]---[/td]
[/tr]
Heavier and lower yield then the standard one. |
|
|
|
Post by Inglonias on Mar 12, 2017 13:24:23 GMT
Heavier and lower yield then the standard one. I need to learn to read. Whoops. I could have sworn it was cheaper. |
|
|
|
Post by The Astronomer on Mar 12, 2017 13:41:02 GMT
Heavier and lower yield then the standard one. I need to learn to read. Whoops. I could have sworn it was cheaper. Eh. Cheaper? CHEAPER? BREAKTHROUGH! CHEAP JUNK! Seriously thou, this is the first time I've ever saw a nuke being sold because it was cheap. |
|
|
|
Post by Inglonias on Mar 12, 2017 14:09:38 GMT
Eh. Cheaper? CHEAPER? BREAKTHROUGH! CHEAP JUNK! Seriously thou, this is the first time I've ever saw a nuke being sold because it was cheap. Get used to it (at least from me). All of my devices are going to try to be cheap.  |
|
