|
Post by jtyotjotjipaefvj on Feb 11, 2018 23:10:06 GMT
I don't know if the game models the fact that melted armor tends to disperse slightly more safely than a more temperature resistant material, but the added hardness of tin and general extra density tends to make it work out decently well for a whipple shield compared to other alternatives, like Aluminium. We don't have to deal with the armor freezing to a point where it falls apart either, so I think it works out great if you ignore the fact that lasers will ruin everything, but that's the case for almost all whipple shielding. It still has just some 200 degrees stability range. Go into battle around Mercury and it will likely have melted off before even seeing enemy lasers, go to outer planets and it will have dusted itself off the hull before you get there. Aluminium doesn't do this kinds of shenanigans and is nice, cheap, common and has RL precedents. Does anyone know how does magnesium fare, BTW? Also, has anyone tested most effective thicknesses and spacings (either vacuum or vacuum++) for different materials? Magnesium has been historically used as armor for air-dropped APCs. On Earth, it has an unwanted side effect of catching fire from the first good hit. It shouldn't be an issue in vacuum though.
|
|
|
Post by AdmiralObvious on Feb 12, 2018 0:08:47 GMT
someone did some kinetics armor test awhile back That was back when Boron was our Lord and savior. Now it's just a pretender to Boron Filament.
|
|
|
Post by Rocket Witch on Feb 12, 2018 6:10:12 GMT
|
|