|
|
Post by The Astronomer on Jun 11, 2017 14:32:16 GMT
thanks edit: what about that thing with notepad NotePad++ and you'll know the difference. |
|
|
|
Post by Kerr on Jun 11, 2017 14:33:24 GMT
thanks edit: what about that thing with notepad NotePad++ and you'll know the difference. Notepad++ is the best. |
|
|
|
Post by randommechanicumguy on Jun 11, 2017 15:00:29 GMT
ive tried what you told me to do. its still crashing
edit: im reinstalling now, gonna use notepad++
|
|
|
|
Post by randommechanicumguy on Jun 11, 2017 15:21:01 GMT
it works, finnaly
|
|
|
|
Post by Kerr on Jun 11, 2017 15:29:08 GMT
What was the error in the first place? |
|
|
|
Post by L5Resident on Jun 12, 2017 5:32:32 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Kerr on Jun 12, 2017 11:34:55 GMT
Crashing atm. Here is my crash file The error is in the fissiles.txt, but this mod doesn't have any "fissile" materials. Can it be that you have mistaken the fusile materials as fissile materials and placed it in the wrong folder? |
|
|
|
Post by L5Resident on Jun 12, 2017 19:26:11 GMT
Crashing atm. Here is my crash file The error is in the fissiles.txt, but this mod doesn't have any "fissile" materials. Can it be that you have mistaken the fusile materials as fissile materials and placed it in the wrong folder? I believe that is exactly what I did wrong lol. |
|
|
|
Post by RiftandRend on Jun 13, 2017 5:20:20 GMT
The way fusion reactants are currently defined is sub-optimal. You have distributed the reaction energy across both reactants, which creates some issues. Examples of this are the separate "product" and "reactant" versions of materials (3 separate versions of protons being the perfect case). If you place all the energy in the unique reactant ( 11B, tritium, positrons/antiprotons, and 3He) then the common reactants become interchangeable and reduces clutter. The Astronomer |
|
|
|
Post by The Astronomer on Jun 13, 2017 5:56:35 GMT
The way fusion reactants are currently defined is sub-optimal. You have distributed the reaction energy across both reactants, which creates some issues. Examples of this are the separate "product" and "reactant" versions of materials (3 separate versions of protons being the perfect case). If you place all the energy in the unique reactant ( 11B, tritium, positrons/antiprotons, and 3He) then the common reactants become interchangeable and reduces clutter. The Astronomer I use the latter way. I don't see much difference between both way, so can you help me test it? |
|
|
|
Post by RiftandRend on Jun 13, 2017 6:35:24 GMT
The way fusion reactants are currently defined is sub-optimal. You have distributed the reaction energy across both reactants, which creates some issues. Examples of this are the separate "product" and "reactant" versions of materials (3 separate versions of protons being the perfect case). If you place all the energy in the unique reactant ( 11B, tritium, positrons/antiprotons, and 3He) then the common reactants become interchangeable and reduces clutter. The Astronomer I use the latter way. I don't see much difference between both way, so can you help me test it? The reactions should perform exactly the same, if that's what you are asking. What I described was a way to reduce the number of elements added by the mod and simplify it for easier modification. Disclaimer: I'm on prescription painkillers, so I may be talking nonsense. |
|
|
|
Post by The Astronomer on Jun 13, 2017 6:44:41 GMT
I use the latter way. I don't see much difference between both way, so can you help me test it? The reactions should perform exactly the same, if that's what you are asking. What I described was a way to reduce the number of elements added by the mod and simplify it for easier modification. Disclaimer: I'm on prescription painkillers, so I may be talking nonsense. Yes. I switched from having 3 separate D to just one deuterium based on DD reaction. |
|
|
|
Post by L5Resident on Jun 13, 2017 7:57:43 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by EshaNas on Jun 24, 2017 22:40:34 GMT
So we open up our files and just put this in somewhere? Neat.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Astronomer on Jul 2, 2017 13:28:24 GMT
J. Starmaker presents: Metallic Hydrogen rocket. Ions.txt Material Metallic Hydrogen
Elements H
ElementCount 1
Density_kg__m3 700
EnthalpyOfFormation_kJ__mol 217.88995
BondDissociationEnergy_kJ__mol 435.7799
GibbsFreeEnergyOfFormation_kJ__mol 0
BulkModulus_GPa .1130
MeltingPoint_K 14.01
BoilingPoint_K 20.28
SpecificHeat_J__kg_K 14310
ThermalConductivity_W__m_K .1085
Viscosity_Pa_s 8.76e-6
RelativePermeability .9999999751
DielectricStrength_MV__m 1.95
RefractiveIndex HydrogenChemicalReactions.txt ChemicalReaction Metallic Hydrogen Reaction
Reactants Metallic Hydrogen
ReactantCounts 2
Products Hydrogen
ProductCounts 1
ActivationEnergy_kJ__mol 436
AutoignitionTemperature_K 1000
CharacteristicLength_m .889Note:- Little is known about metallic hydrogen, so other than density ( Project Rho) and EnthalpyOfFormation_kJ__mol (BondDissociationEnergy_kJ__mol/2), all stats are Hydrogen's. Credible adjustments are welcomed. - Current exhaust velocity is way too high. |
|
