Future Tech (Fusion ship) thread

Good Christ that's overpowered.

Gonna be a while. I gotta wrap my head around a bunch of new stuff.
Morokweng has 240GW of power generation capability. After to allow for weapons and hotel load I figure she's got about 170 GW left over for propulsion, principally to drive the confinement nozzles. I can't plausibly fit two thirds of that onto a six ton drone. 

Morokweng can reach roughly two thirds of that acceleration at the moment but your point remains the same and your maths is remarkably good.

The impact structure in Africa.

You should start tagging people.
1. You don't necessarily need particle accelerators. Nor Lasers. There is Antimatter, Z-pinch, Polywell, Magnetic Confinement.
2. An fusion reactor can provide it's own immense power demnand. Your ship can give an impulse to start if you choose to.
3. You can't expect that people know your tech level. Wormholes give the impression that this civilization is on a technological level extremely well developed. Type 2.5-3. I didn't knew that the stellerators were that hard to produce.

Yes, you are right about scale, this is also why your ship had a higher fusion power density, even thought the fact that your have seemingly less mass devoted into stellerators, but feel free to correct if I am wrong, maybe you do have tens of kilotons of stellerators.

Althought, the Adamites have no problem utilizing NSWR in masses. Which is weird considering the scarcity of fissiles, espacially enriched ones. Or is this an wanted trait?

You shouldn't use the MPTD-Fusion bus as an standart missile. More as an tactical weapon. Something like a Tomahawk, expensive, effective, but most often overkill.

Thanks for your reply. I'll take your points in order. 
1) I understood from previous conversations here that starting a p-B11 fusion required a particle beam. If this isn't the case why I can't I have p-B11 nozzles on my drones?
2) It would appear to violate conservation of energy, to use the energy of and explosion to contain that explosion. I understood that I needed to generate energy to maintain the magnetic confinement field in addition to energy tapped from that fusion. 
3) I don't expect anyone to know what's going on inside my head. If it helps I'll explain a little further. The wormhole model I'm using is the Visser non-rotating wormhole. Essentially space time is a crunched up N-dimensional space with a minimum of seven dimensions. Some of these dimensions are collapsed because of their low energy states. Wormholes take advantage of this in that the Visser bridges they are using are naturally occurring in places where certain conditions are met. The presence of a sufficiently massive star, with a sufficiently massive satellite holding a stable orbit, with stable, non-rotating lagrangian points. At the L1 point there will be a point where the gravitational stresses of the who objects are balanced and there is enough "play" in space time.  In practical terms you also need the presence of a strong magnetosphere at that planet, preferably through which moves another satellite, acting as a sort of cosmic dynamo. In brief, you can tap energy from that magnetosphere in a variety of ways and you can energize that low energy dimension and usually it forms a bridge between you and another similar system elsewhere. This takes a truly staggering amount of energy, far beyond the capabilities of my ships. Wormholes therefore have to be maintained by dedicated structures. Anywhere these conditions are not met cannot be formed into a wormhole. The tech level of the systems commonwealth is extremely high but they are not quite yet post scarcity. I'd say they're edging towards almost a type two civilization. The Adamites are slightly lower tech level but a strongly stratified society making it easier for them to centralize the resources and wealth required to build big set piece dreadnoughts. These ships also act as symbols of the personal wealth of prestige of the men who pay for them. I have borrowed liberally from the late period of the Roman Republic here. They also really don't mind the mess and fuss that goes with it because the decision makers don't have to live with the mess. In any case, NSWR is really their only option if they want to compete with the SC's confinement bottle technology. It doesn't really work but it's better than the alternatives.  I'm aware there are both flaws in my knowledge and gaps in my narrative. This is why I'm here, hoping to improve my work. I am therefore very grateful for the help you give. Let's just say I take a more skeptical view about what's going to be possible in future. For example, I generally take a dim view of anything that requires antimatter. I think it's just too much of a pain in the arse to be worth dealing with.

Also, I thought of a use for your MPDT boosted missile. I stuck a 10kg osmium slug in the nose and coated it in VANTA and gave it a great big ass battery to give it ten seconds of thrust. I'm using it as a really nasty kinetic mine. It's low signature and high acceleration make it ideal for applications where it doesn't have a first stage booster.