|
Post by ironclad6 on Feb 6, 2018 12:08:36 GMT
Is there nothing for He-3 He-3 fusion? No, I only gave data for DT, pB11, DD, DHe³ and 4p to The AstronomerThanks. Is there a way to calculate fusion products? He-3 He-3 is differently performative to the other alternatives that I rather thought it might be advantageous to study.
|
|
|
Post by ironclad6 on Feb 6, 2018 12:27:28 GMT
Also, DD fusion reaction appears in my infolinks but not in my drop down list of selectable reactions. I can't work out why. Any ideas?
|
|
|
Post by RiftandRend on Feb 8, 2018 3:20:20 GMT
Also, DD fusion reaction appears in my infolinks but not in my drop down list of selectable reactions. I can't work out why. Any ideas? It may be modeled as an explosive reaction rather than a rocket combustion reaction. Does the reaction have a characteristic length?
|
|
|
Post by koganusan on Feb 8, 2018 15:08:35 GMT
|
|
|
Post by The Astronomer on Feb 8, 2018 15:40:16 GMT
Sounds like a cool novelty propellant
|
|
|
Post by RiftandRend on Feb 10, 2018 1:05:11 GMT
This should be a workable representation of metastable helium. I had to make quite a few assumptions, so most of the data is from liquid or solid helium. Additionally, the density is the theoretical density from the first source. The highest density I could find that has been achieved in a lab was 6.644518272425249*10 -11 kg/m 3. Material Metastable Helium Elements He ElementCount 1 Density_kg__m3 300 EnthalpyOfFormation_kJ__mol 1600 BondDissociationEnergy_kJ__mol 0 GibbsFreeEnergyOfFormation_kJ__mol 0 MeltingPoint_K 1.2 BoilingPoint_K 600 SpecificHeat_J__kg_K 5193.12 ThermalConductivity_W__m_K 72.4 Viscosity_Pa_s .000019 RelativePermeability .9999999941 Resistivity_Ohm_m 1 RefractiveIndex Helium
Material Exhaust Helium Elements He ElementCount 1 Density_kg__m3 70.85 EnthalpyOfFormation_kJ__mol 0 BondDissociationEnergy_kJ__mol 0 GibbsFreeEnergyOfFormation_kJ__mol 0 ThermalConductivity_W__m_K 1815 SpecificHeat_J__kg_K 5193.12 RefractiveIndex Helium
ChemicalReaction Metastable Helium Reactants Metastable Helium ReactantCounts 1 Products Exhaust Helium ProductCounts 1 ActivationEnergy_kJ__mol 0 AutoignitionTemperature_K 600 CharacteristicLength_m 1
You will probably have to use a magnetic nozzle (or at least a crude representation of one) with this engine, as it reaches 70,000+ k. To use it in a vaguely realistic way, you should match the thrust power of your engine with reactor power. Material Shielded Superconducting Magnetic Nozzle Elements Nb Sn W He N Na Al C ElementCount 3 1 6 10 7 5 5 3 Density_kg__m3 4500 YieldStrength_MPa 1000000 Cost_c__kg 300 UltimateTensileStrength_MPa 1000000 YoungsModulus_GPa 410 ShearModulus_GPa 161 SpecificHeat_J__kg_K 500 MeltingPoint_K 500000000000 ThermalConductivity_W__m_K 100000 ThermalExpansion__K 1e-10 Resistivity_Ohm_m 1e-10 RefractiveIndex Tungsten RoughnessCoefficient .9 web.archive.org/web/20040804131304/http://www.islandone.org/APC/Chemical/07.htmlaip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.3258198
|
|
|
Post by koganusan on Feb 10, 2018 3:52:25 GMT
Nice work. I just tried it out, and unfortunately with the necessary reactor mass it seems to occupy an awkward middle ground between MPDs and high-thrust engines. There doesn't seem to be much it can do that a NTR/resistojet and MPD combo can't do better, beyond a compactness and possibly efficient maneuvering in a deep gravity well. It's honestly far less cheaty in practice than it feels like it ought to be.
|
|
|
Post by morrigi on Feb 22, 2018 6:47:55 GMT
I'm getting a null products error for Deuterium-Deuterium fusion. What gives?
|
|
|
Post by The Astronomer on Feb 23, 2018 5:35:24 GMT
I'm getting a null products error for Deuterium-Deuterium fusion. What gives? You didn't have the product element required. Try install Fusiles.txt and Ions.txt again.
|
|
|
Post by The Astronomer on Feb 23, 2018 5:35:58 GMT
I'm getting a null products error for Deuterium-Deuterium fusion. What gives? You probably don't have the product element required. Try install Fusiles.txt and Ions.txt again.
|
|
|
Post by RiftandRend on Feb 26, 2018 19:43:28 GMT
I tried to model our fusion rockets using the NTR module rather than the combustion rocket module, which allows more interesting designs. You can vary the amount of reaction mass fed into the engine, allowing higher acceleration designs without having to create a new chemical reaction. The main downside of this is that power requirements are hard to calculate and direct fusion exhaust is nonexistent.
For Data folder.
Element FusionTritium Symbol Tf AtomicMass 3 AtomicNumber 1 MolarMass_g__mol 3.0160492 IsANonmetal true FirstIonizationEnergy_kJ__mol 1312.0 HalfLife_s 3.89e8 MicroscopicThermalNeutronCaptureCrossSection_b 86.70 MicroscopicThermalNeutronScatteringCrossSection_b 15.98 MicroscopicThermalNeutronFissionCrossSection_b 504.81 MicroscopicFastNeutronCaptureCrossSection_b .095 MicroscopicFastNeutronScatteringCrossSection_b 4.409 MicroscopicFastNeutronFissionCrossSection_b 1.219 MicroscopicResonanceIntegralCaptureCrossSection_b 131.97 MicroscopicResonanceIntegralScatteringCrossSection_b 152.82 MicroscopicResonanceIntegralFissionCrossSection_b 271.53 AverageNeutronsProducedPerThermalFission 2.433 AverageNeutronsProducedPerFastFission 2.583 FissionEnergy_MeV 3.5 UnenrichedElement Hydrogen MeanGammaRayMassAbsorptionCoefficient_cm2__g 1.263e-01 SolarAbundance 0 Emission Hydrogen TransmutationParents D Li-6 Li
For Materials folder.
Material D-T Fusion Mixture Elements Tf D ElementCount 1 1 Density_kg__m3 19100 EnthalpyOfFormation_kJ__mol 0 BondDissociationEnergy_kJ__mol 446.67 GibbsFreeEnergyOfFormation_kJ__mol 0 BulkModulus_GPa .1130 MeltingPoint_K 765000000 ThermalConductivity_W__m_K .13007 SpecificHeat_J__kg_K 5200 Viscosity_Pa_s 12.6e-6 RefractiveIndex Hydrogen
Material Placeholder Structural Material Elements C ElementCount 1 Density_kg__m3 100000 Cost_c__kg 300 YieldStrength_MPa 1000000 UltimateTensileStrength_MPa 1000000 YoungsModulus_GPa 1220 ShearModulus_GPa 508.3 MeltingPoint_K 1000000000 SpecificHeat_J__kg_K 519 ThermalConductivity_W__m_K 2100 ThermalExpansion__K .9e-6 ThermoelectricSensitivity_V__K 20e-6 Resistivity_Ohm_m 1e18 DielectricStrength_MV__m 1000 RelativePermittivity 5.7 BandGap_eV 5.45 LasingDamageThreshold_TW__m2 .00051 RefractiveIndex Diamond RoughnessCoefficient 0.1
Material Placeholder Control Material Elements Li-6 ElementCount 1 Density_kg__m3 100000 Cost_c__kg 300 YieldStrength_MPa 1000000 UltimateTensileStrength_MPa 1000000 YoungsModulus_GPa 1220 ShearModulus_GPa 508.3 MeltingPoint_K 1000000000 SpecificHeat_J__kg_K 519 ThermalConductivity_W__m_K 2100 ThermalExpansion__K .9e-6 ThermoelectricSensitivity_V__K 20e-6 Resistivity_Ohm_m 1e18 DielectricStrength_MV__m 1000 RelativePermittivity 5.7 BandGap_eV 5.45 LasingDamageThreshold_TW__m2 .00051 RefractiveIndex Diamond RoughnessCoefficient 0.1
Material Shielded Superconducting Magnetic Nozzle Elements Nb Sn W He N Na Al C ElementCount 3 1 6 10 7 5 5 3 Density_kg__m3 4500 Cost_c__kg 300 YieldStrength_MPa 1000000 UltimateTensileStrength_MPa 1000000 YoungsModulus_GPa 410 ShearModulus_GPa 161 SpecificHeat_J__kg_K 500 MeltingPoint_K 1000000000 ThermalConductivity_W__m_K 100000 ThermalExpansion__K 1e-10 Resistivity_Ohm_m 1e-10 RefractiveIndex Tungsten RoughnessCoefficient .9
|
|
|
Post by AtomHeartDragon on Feb 26, 2018 20:08:52 GMT
I tried to model our fusion rockets using the NTR module rather than the combustion rocket module, which allows more interesting designs. You can vary the amount of reaction mass fed into the engine, allowing higher acceleration designs without having to create a new chemical reaction. And, as a nice side effect, no more touchy fusile monoprops.
|
|
|
Post by Enderminion on Feb 27, 2018 13:22:35 GMT
I tried to model our fusion rockets using the NTR module rather than the combustion rocket module, which allows more interesting designs. You can vary the amount of reaction mass fed into the engine, allowing higher acceleration designs without having to create a new chemical reaction. The main downside of this is that power requirements are hard to calculate and direct fusion exhaust is nonexistent. For Data folder. Element FusionTritium Symbol Tf AtomicMass 3 AtomicNumber 1 MolarMass_g__mol 3.0160492 IsANonmetal true FirstIonizationEnergy_kJ__mol 1312.0 HalfLife_s 3.89e8 MicroscopicThermalNeutronCaptureCrossSection_b 86.70 MicroscopicThermalNeutronScatteringCrossSection_b 15.98 MicroscopicThermalNeutronFissionCrossSection_b 504.81 MicroscopicFastNeutronCaptureCrossSection_b .095 MicroscopicFastNeutronScatteringCrossSection_b 4.409 MicroscopicFastNeutronFissionCrossSection_b 1.219 MicroscopicResonanceIntegralCaptureCrossSection_b 131.97 MicroscopicResonanceIntegralScatteringCrossSection_b 152.82 MicroscopicResonanceIntegralFissionCrossSection_b 271.53 AverageNeutronsProducedPerThermalFission 2.433 AverageNeutronsProducedPerFastFission 2.583 FissionEnergy_MeV 3.5 UnenrichedElement Hydrogen MeanGammaRayMassAbsorptionCoefficient_cm2__g 1.263e-01 SolarAbundance 0 Emission Hydrogen TransmutationParents D Li-6 Li
For Materials folder.
Material D-T Fusion Mixture Elements Tf D ElementCount 1 1 Density_kg__m3 19100 EnthalpyOfFormation_kJ__mol 0 BondDissociationEnergy_kJ__mol 446.67 GibbsFreeEnergyOfFormation_kJ__mol 0 BulkModulus_GPa .1130 MeltingPoint_K 765000000 ThermalConductivity_W__m_K .13007 SpecificHeat_J__kg_K 5200 Viscosity_Pa_s 12.6e-6 RefractiveIndex Hydrogen
Material Placeholder Structural Material Elements C ElementCount 1 Density_kg__m3 100000 Cost_c__kg 300 YieldStrength_MPa 1000000 UltimateTensileStrength_MPa 1000000 YoungsModulus_GPa 1220 ShearModulus_GPa 508.3 MeltingPoint_K 1000000000 SpecificHeat_J__kg_K 519 ThermalConductivity_W__m_K 2100 ThermalExpansion__K .9e-6 ThermoelectricSensitivity_V__K 20e-6 Resistivity_Ohm_m 1e18 DielectricStrength_MV__m 1000 RelativePermittivity 5.7 BandGap_eV 5.45 LasingDamageThreshold_TW__m2 .00051 RefractiveIndex Diamond RoughnessCoefficient 0.1
Material Placeholder Control Material Elements Li-6 ElementCount 1 Density_kg__m3 100000 Cost_c__kg 300 YieldStrength_MPa 1000000 UltimateTensileStrength_MPa 1000000 YoungsModulus_GPa 1220 ShearModulus_GPa 508.3 MeltingPoint_K 1000000000 SpecificHeat_J__kg_K 519 ThermalConductivity_W__m_K 2100 ThermalExpansion__K .9e-6 ThermoelectricSensitivity_V__K 20e-6 Resistivity_Ohm_m 1e18 DielectricStrength_MV__m 1000 RelativePermittivity 5.7 BandGap_eV 5.45 LasingDamageThreshold_TW__m2 .00051 RefractiveIndex Diamond RoughnessCoefficient 0.1
Material Shielded Superconducting Magnetic Nozzle Elements Nb Sn W He N Na Al C ElementCount 3 1 6 10 7 5 5 3 Density_kg__m3 4500 Cost_c__kg 300 YieldStrength_MPa 1000000 UltimateTensileStrength_MPa 1000000 YoungsModulus_GPa 410 ShearModulus_GPa 161 SpecificHeat_J__kg_K 500 MeltingPoint_K 1000000000 ThermalConductivity_W__m_K 100000 ThermalExpansion__K 1e-10 Resistivity_Ohm_m 1e-10 RefractiveIndex Tungsten RoughnessCoefficient .9
fuel rods will still melt, right?
|
|
|
Post by Brackish on Feb 27, 2018 17:36:41 GMT
Hence the placeholder materials that survive 1 billion Kelvin
|
|
|
Post by Enderminion on Feb 28, 2018 4:00:04 GMT
I tried to model our fusion rockets using the NTR module rather than the combustion rocket module, which allows more interesting designs. You can vary the amount of reaction mass fed into the engine, allowing higher acceleration designs without having to create a new chemical reaction. The main downside of this is that power requirements are hard to calculate and direct fusion exhaust is nonexistent. For Data folder. Element FusionTritium Symbol Tf AtomicMass 3 AtomicNumber 1 MolarMass_g__mol 3.0160492 IsANonmetal true FirstIonizationEnergy_kJ__mol 1312.0 HalfLife_s 3.89e8 MicroscopicThermalNeutronCaptureCrossSection_b 86.70 MicroscopicThermalNeutronScatteringCrossSection_b 15.98 MicroscopicThermalNeutronFissionCrossSection_b 504.81 MicroscopicFastNeutronCaptureCrossSection_b .095 MicroscopicFastNeutronScatteringCrossSection_b 4.409 MicroscopicFastNeutronFissionCrossSection_b 1.219 MicroscopicResonanceIntegralCaptureCrossSection_b 131.97 MicroscopicResonanceIntegralScatteringCrossSection_b 152.82 MicroscopicResonanceIntegralFissionCrossSection_b 271.53 AverageNeutronsProducedPerThermalFission 2.433 AverageNeutronsProducedPerFastFission 2.583 FissionEnergy_MeV 3.5 UnenrichedElement Hydrogen MeanGammaRayMassAbsorptionCoefficient_cm2__g 1.263e-01 SolarAbundance 0 Emission Hydrogen TransmutationParents D Li-6 Li
For Materials folder. Material D-T Fusion Mixture Elements Tf D ElementCount 1 1 Density_kg__m3 19100 EnthalpyOfFormation_kJ__mol 0 BondDissociationEnergy_kJ__mol 446.67 GibbsFreeEnergyOfFormation_kJ__mol 0 BulkModulus_GPa .1130 MeltingPoint_K 765000000 ThermalConductivity_W__m_K .13007 SpecificHeat_J__kg_K 5200 Viscosity_Pa_s 12.6e-6 RefractiveIndex Hydrogen
Material Placeholder Structural Material Elements C ElementCount 1 Density_kg__m3 100000 Cost_c__kg 300 YieldStrength_MPa 1000000 UltimateTensileStrength_MPa 1000000 YoungsModulus_GPa 1220 ShearModulus_GPa 508.3 MeltingPoint_K 1000000000 SpecificHeat_J__kg_K 519 ThermalConductivity_W__m_K 2100 ThermalExpansion__K .9e-6 ThermoelectricSensitivity_V__K 20e-6 Resistivity_Ohm_m 1e18 DielectricStrength_MV__m 1000 RelativePermittivity 5.7 BandGap_eV 5.45 LasingDamageThreshold_TW__m2 .00051 RefractiveIndex Diamond RoughnessCoefficient 0.1
Material Placeholder Control Material Elements Li-6 ElementCount 1 Density_kg__m3 100000 Cost_c__kg 300 YieldStrength_MPa 1000000 UltimateTensileStrength_MPa 1000000 YoungsModulus_GPa 1220 ShearModulus_GPa 508.3 MeltingPoint_K 1000000000 SpecificHeat_J__kg_K 519 ThermalConductivity_W__m_K 2100 ThermalExpansion__K .9e-6 ThermoelectricSensitivity_V__K 20e-6 Resistivity_Ohm_m 1e18 DielectricStrength_MV__m 1000 RelativePermittivity 5.7 BandGap_eV 5.45 LasingDamageThreshold_TW__m2 .00051 RefractiveIndex Diamond RoughnessCoefficient 0.1
Material Shielded Superconducting Magnetic Nozzle Elements Nb Sn W He N Na Al C ElementCount 3 1 6 10 7 5 5 3 Density_kg__m3 4500 Cost_c__kg 300 YieldStrength_MPa 1000000 UltimateTensileStrength_MPa 1000000 YoungsModulus_GPa 410 ShearModulus_GPa 161 SpecificHeat_J__kg_K 500 MeltingPoint_K 1000000000 ThermalConductivity_W__m_K 100000 ThermalExpansion__K 1e-10 Resistivity_Ohm_m 1e-10 RefractiveIndex Tungsten RoughnessCoefficient .9 I got a CTD Version: CDE 1.2.0.2 Windows
Loading English...Done in 123ms
Loading Themes...Done in 48ms
4.5.13401 Compatibility Profile Context 15.201.1301.0
Max Texture Image Units: 18
Max Combined Texture Image Units: 108
Max Vertex Texture Image Units: 18
Max Draw Buffers: 8
Max Texture Size: 16384
Loading Shaders...Done in 2329ms
Loading Game
...Loading Limits...Done in 38ms
Loading Sound Effects...Done in 18ms
Loading SoundFiles...
Done in 7169ms
Loading Star Chart...Done in 292ms
Loading Refraction Indices...Done in 342ms
Loading Emission Lines...Done in 324ms
Loading Elements...Assertion at Reflection\SimpleSerializationManager.cpp(81): Hydrogen Pointer
Error: EXCEPTION_BREAKPOINT
0 0x75062cc2 DebugBreak Line Info Error 487
1 0x016da1b5 util::SerializationManagerInterface::SetValue z:\documents\code\utilities\utilities\reflection\serialization.cpp(633)
2 0x016d9231 util::SerializationManagerInterface::DeserializeClassMember z:\documents\code\utilities\utilities\reflection\serialization.cpp(417)
3 0x016d7816 util::SerializationManagerInterface::LoadDataFile z:\documents\code\utilities\utilities\reflection\serialization.cpp(201)
4 0x0139e9f8 <lambda_2046fd7a31fcbeda893f88e6a9eb861b>::operator() z:\documents\code\cde\cde\logistic\metagame.cpp(76)
5 0x013a72c9 GameManager::CustomLoad<<lambda_2046fd7a31fcbeda893f88e6a9eb861b> > z:\documents\code\engine\infrastructure\gameplay.h(35)
6 0x0139ee2d MetagameManager::LoadAll z:\documents\code\cde\cde\logistic\metagame.cpp(99)
7 0x016abe5a GameManager::LoadAll z:\documents\code\engine\infrastructure\gameplay.cpp(189)
8 0x016ac107 GameManager::Tick z:\documents\code\engine\infrastructure\gameplay.cpp(242)
9 0x012cc4d5 main z:\documents\code\cde\cde\common\main.cpp(83)
10 0x0177dc27 __scrt_common_main_seh f:\dd\vctools\crt\vcstartup\src\startup\exe_common.inl(283)
11 0x74838654 BaseThreadInitThunk Line Info Error 487
12 0x77724a77 RtlGetAppContainerNamedObjectPath Line Info Error 487
13 0x77724a47 RtlGetAppContainerNamedObjectPath Line Info Error 487
|
|