|
Post by Enderminion on Mar 10, 2017 13:38:56 GMT
wait -16000K? that doesn't make sense!
|
|
|
Post by The Astronomer on Mar 10, 2017 13:41:54 GMT
wait -16000K? that doesn't make sense! Nothing bugged will make any sense.
|
|
|
Post by omnipotentvoid on Mar 10, 2017 14:06:59 GMT
wait -16000K? that doesn't make sense! Nothing bugged will make any sense. Actually, negative kelvin temperatures are a thing. Only 0K is impossible. Negative kelvin temperatures basically means that there are more particles in a higher energy quantum state than in lower ones. As such negative kelvin temperatures are hotter than any positive kelvin temperature, as heat will always flow from the -K object to the +K object.
|
|
|
Post by The Astronomer on Mar 10, 2017 14:13:29 GMT
Nothing bugged will make any sense. Actually, negative kelvin temperatures are a thing. Only 0K is impossible. Negative kelvin temperatures basically means that there are more particles in a higher energy quantum state than in lower ones. As such negative kelvin temperatures are hotter than any positive kelvin temperature, as heat will always flow from the -K object to the +K object. You know what? I experienced that by myself.
|
|
|
Post by someusername6 on Mar 10, 2017 17:17:40 GMT
Nothing bugged will make any sense. Actually, negative kelvin temperatures are a thing. Only 0K is impossible. Negative kelvin temperatures basically means that there are more particles in a higher energy quantum state than in lower ones. As such negative kelvin temperatures are hotter than any positive kelvin temperature, as heat will always flow from the -K object to the +K object. Yes, but qswitched has mentioned before that negative temperatures on reactors are a bug.
|
|
|
Post by Enderminion on Mar 10, 2017 17:37:54 GMT
Actually, negative kelvin temperatures are a thing. Only 0K is impossible. Negative kelvin temperatures basically means that there are more particles in a higher energy quantum state than in lower ones. As such negative kelvin temperatures are hotter than any positive kelvin temperature, as heat will always flow from the -K object to the +K object. Yes, but @qswitched has mentioned before that negative temperatures on reactors are a bug. its @ admin (remove the space) for qswitched
|
|
|
Post by omnipotentvoid on Mar 10, 2017 17:56:11 GMT
Actually, negative kelvin temperatures are a thing. Only 0K is impossible. Negative kelvin temperatures basically means that there are more particles in a higher energy quantum state than in lower ones. As such negative kelvin temperatures are hotter than any positive kelvin temperature, as heat will always flow from the -K object to the +K object. Yes, but qswitched has mentioned before that negative temperatures on reactors are a bug. I know its a bug. Adding negative kelvin temperatures would imply an ability to specifically control quantum states of particles on a large scale. That's a technology that is far more than 200 years away.
|
|
|
Post by The Astronomer on Mar 11, 2017 3:25:15 GMT
I wonder where are capacitors for lasers?
|
|
|
Post by Enderminion on Mar 11, 2017 3:26:13 GMT
I wonder where are capacitors for lasers? they are called qswitches and they make pulse lasers
|
|
|
Post by The Astronomer on Mar 11, 2017 3:30:10 GMT
I wonder where are capacitors for lasers? they are called qswitches and they make pulse lasers I know that already, but when are they coming?
|
|
|
Post by Enderminion on Mar 11, 2017 3:49:17 GMT
they are called qswitches and they make pulse lasers I know that already, but when are they coming? next patch, and if they're not in the next patch then the one after that. (go back to the front and read it again)
|
|
|
Post by Lachie on Oct 12, 2017 6:11:53 GMT
I've noticed that the total energy stored by the capacitors in game is different from the value I get when I input the voltage and capacitance into the capacitor energy formula ( E = 0.5*C*V^2 ).
Eg: I made a 450V 15mF capacitor which, according to the game only stores 927 J
If I were to input these values into the above formula I get 1518.75 J
I think this discrepancy implies a bug.
|
|