|
|
Post by gedzilla on Jan 1, 2017 14:04:07 GMT
|
|
khenderson
New Member
my god, it's full of missiles
Posts: 40 
|
Post by khenderson on Jan 1, 2017 15:27:11 GMT
The primary problem appears to be the turnaround time. I've never managed stable flight out of a missile over 3.2 kg with a turnaround time that low. I'd suggest you reduce the gimbal angle and/or thrust on the rocket until your turnaround time is 1.2+. That should get your missile in the ballpark.
Beyond that, there are two additional areas you could explore for further improvements. First, you might lower the acceleration to extend the terminal phase burn, which will significantly improve accuracy against maneuvering targets. The second would be minor changes to the guidance system, such as slightly lowering the damping factor on the midcourse phase and possibly changing the terminal phase to straight proportional. Augmented Proportional occasionally outperforms proportional in the terminal phase, but sometimes it overreacts. It becomes a definite handicap with directional warheads, such NEFPs.
|
|
|
|
Post by gedzilla on Jan 1, 2017 15:59:15 GMT
699 ms turnaround time is to little, or to much ?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Astronomer on Jan 1, 2017 16:22:16 GMT
699 ms turnaround time is to little, or to much ? Obviously, too little. Try to reduce the acceleration, too, or it will run out of power before it ever get a chance to correct its trajectory. Best is at about 30s burn time. |
|
