Solar System Organization of Standardization [2017-01-31]

Give it a few days. Apophys will work on a better design

There may be some precision loss on the 10 kt yield design, going from the picture -- I think some of the values may be rounded by the interface, and I get the fusion fuel pressure stress error. Can you post the design files themselves?

Hiyall!!

I'm about to go through everything that's been added lately and add it to the OP.

That being said, this is hosted on GitHub, and approving Pull Requests IS a lot faster. I usually go over everything every week or so, but PRs I can just accept at any point during the day. It's in the same repo as the in progress engine sharing tool, under CDE.bbcode: github.com/Copperdust/CoaDE-Engine-Plot/blob/master/CDE.bbcode

Also, anyone is free to use anything in the OP that requires my permission, continue/expand this thread/etc without needing to tell me. Just in case I die or stop updating this for whatever reason, no need for this to die with me

ANYWAY. Onto updating things!

Added nukes, thanks jasonvance!

Quick note on turret armor, while silica does last longer than most materials against lasers, it has been heavily nerfed and doesn't last nearly as long as Aramid Fiber.

Against that blue laser I had posted 1cm of Silica evaporates instantly at 250km where 1cm of Aramid lasts at least 10 seconds.

EDIT:

Did some quick tests again, this time with a stopwatch so its scientific. 


For three trials 1cm of Aramid Fiber lasted 17.42s, 17.44s, and 17.82s against the Blue Laser at 250km, with inaccuracies being ship movement and my reaction time to hit start.

On the other hand for 3 trials of 1cm Silica Aerogel, it lasted 0 seconds 0.32 seconds, and 0 seconds. So big inaccuracies here as I didn't really have the time to hit start on my phone.

Although I think against nuclear warheads Silica should still hold out better.


Some other honorable mentions

• Ceramic Oxide Composite at 11.47, 11.83, 13.58
• Nitrile Rubber at 6, 5.25, 6.69
• Hafnia and Hafnium Carbide for their pretty purple sparks.

Trying to recreate Ceramic Oxide Composite's success with other cheaper Ceramic Oxides (Hafnia, Alluminum Oxide, Beryllium Oxide, etc.) was unsuccessful.

I posted this a little while ago in the unlimited power thread but I figured it would be nice to have on the standardization thread as well. It is the most optimal radiator composition for each outlet temp range.

Lithium: 0K - 452k                                      (59.1 tons / 100,000m^2 239,000c / 100,000m^2)
Calcium: 425k - 1110k                                (172 tons / 100,000m^2 1,000,000c / 100,000m^2)
RCC: 1110k-2270k                                      (194 tons / 100,000m^2 14,700,000c / 100,000m^2)
Boron: 2270k - 2348k                                  (230 tons / 100,000m^2 4,000,000c / 100,000m^2)
Boron Nitrade: 2349k - 3244k                        (233 tons / 100,000m^2 4,890,000c / 100,000m^2)
Amorphus Carbon: 3245k - 3913k                  (233 tons / 100,000m^2 5,200,000c / 100,000m^2)
Pyrolitic Carbon: 3913-3920k                        (249 tons / 100,000m^2 5,580,000c / 100,000m^2)
Halfnium Carbide 3920k - 4158k                   (1,410 tons / 100,000m^2 86,800,000c / 100,000m^2)
Tantalum Halfnium Carbide: 4158k-4486k       (1,620 tons / 100,000m^2 282,000,000 / 100,000m^2)

RCC is the only one off in terms of costing more than the next step up all the others are in line of higher mass / cost for each step up.