|
Post by matterbeam on Feb 18, 2019 19:41:08 GMT
|
|
|
Post by airc777 on Feb 19, 2019 2:51:49 GMT
Link appears to go to 'sorry this page does not exist'.
|
|
|
Post by cipherpunks on Feb 19, 2019 11:35:37 GMT
Link appears to go to 'sorry this page does not exist'. Does Your (yes your, because it's still yours, isn't it?) browser has address field a.k.a URL bar, or You already sold your 'soul' to google entirely 'no questions asked'? If latter is indeed the case, then - specially for you - correct link without easily spotted trailing garbageand no, I absolutely can not resist sarcasm in this particular case.
|
|
|
Post by airc777 on Feb 19, 2019 14:28:53 GMT
Link appears to go to 'sorry this page does not exist'. Does Your (yes your, because it's still yours, isn't it?) browser has address field a.k.a URL bar, or You already sold your 'soul' to google entirely 'no questions asked'? If latter is indeed the case, then - specially for you - correct link without easily spotted trailing garbageand no, I absolutely can not resist sarcasm in this particular case.Yeah, I'm lazy and I should have caught that. Or tried googleing "toughsf.blogspot.com/2019/02/cold-laser-coupled-particle-beams.html". Or tried clicking the last update on the blog page.
What's causing Firefox to add that? Neither clicking the link, nor right clicking and copy link location and pasting into url, nor right click open in new tab, nor right click open in new window worked.
So I just now opened Firefox-Isn't-Behaving and repeated the above. Clicking it directly didn't work and it didn't have the trailing text, but then selecting the address bar from that screen and just hitting enter immediately fixed it.
Now I'm even more confused.
|
|
|
Post by cipherpunks on Feb 19, 2019 19:48:31 GMT
Firefox-Isn't-Behaving [...] Now I'm even more confused. No wonder, because the 'web 2.0' "industry" wants You to be. They do anything they can to reach this goal, to take control off of You. Now they want to take away Your URL bar - first in part (obfuscation), then in full. In the end there would be only 'googling' left. My advise would be to use some older ESR version, or former XUL-enabled ESR ( if You know how to handle some unfixed CVE's), sandboxed ( separate user account, VM *, whatever). Alternatively, try Waterfox, Basilisk or Pale Moon forks in that order (last one still has full XUL support a.k.a non-limited addons), or TorBrowser (but this particular forum brutally banned it I don't know why).Last resort would be Iridium, but it ain't no 'fox. uMatrix is a must. Fresh (e.g. latest versions) user-agent strings can be obtained here as always, so the sites would think You're a 'default' blond maid with 'default' Chrome. Profile hardening links (privacy, kill telemetry, etc) in no particular order:* VirtualBox seems to be the easiest from them all, and free.
|
|
|
Post by lucubratory on Feb 20, 2019 3:59:04 GMT
Firefox-Isn't-Behaving [...] Now I'm even more confused. No wonder, because the 'web 2.0' "industry" wants You to be. They do anything they can to reach this goal, to take control off of You. Now they want to take away Your URL bar - first in part (obfuscation), then in full. In the end there would be only 'googling' left. My advise would be to use some older ESR version, or former XUL-enabled ESR ( if You know how to handle some unfixed CVE's), sandboxed ( separate user account, VM *, whatever). Alternatively, try Waterfox, Basilisk or Pale Moon forks in that order (last one still had XUL), orĀ TorBrowser (but this particular forum brutally banned it I don't know why).Last resort would be Iridium, but it ain't no 'fox. uMatrix is a must. Fresh (e.g. latest versions) user-agent strings can be obtained here as always, so the sites would think You're a 'default' blond maid with 'default' Chrome. Profile hardening links (privacy, kill telemetry, etc) in no particular order:* VirtualBox seems to be the easiest from them all, and free."Cipherpunks", if that is your real name, I'm guessing I'm not the only person who has a lot of trouble reading your extremely unusual and punctuated formatting style. Would you be willing to do us all a favour and try to limit use of bolding, italics, underlining, unusual punctuation, or any combination of the above to only certain words, perhaps a maximum of three or four per post (note this is still many more than most)? I understand the desire to have all possible emphasis on every word, but as I mentioned it's confusing to read, and in my opinion it also makes your intended point less impactful, notably by making it difficult to read in the first place. Thank you for taking the time to read this message. I promise I'm not employed by the Web 2.0 industry.
|
|
|
Post by matterbeam on Feb 21, 2019 23:43:59 GMT
Link appears to go to 'sorry this page does not exist'.
Fixed!
|
|