|
Post by n2maniac on Oct 19, 2016 6:14:54 GMT
As a EE, seeing 10MW made in one part of the ship and consumed by, of all things, a railgun at a different part of the ship is making me wonder if we are missing at least one of a few BIG limiting components:
1) Power electronics. A good DC-DC converter is in the 1-10MW/ton range, and rejects 5-20% of its power as heat not that far above 300K. This says to me this would become incredibly burdensome without shifting to a different power transfer paradigm.
2) Power wiring. This actually may be less of an issue for 2 reasons: high temperature wire sensitive to oxidation (eg. tungsten) can be used without much regard to self-heating, and sufficient insulation can provide high voltage transmission. Still, transferring 10MW at voltages typical of what is on Earth (480V is popular for safety and other reasons) results in a nontrivial current (20,000A).
Assuming what I said is true (I can dig up some more exact numbers and reputable sources if desired), thoughts on this aspect? I am torn between "this is the Achilles's heel of the high power warships" and "too much detail, too much making things lame".
|
|
|
Post by beatle on Oct 20, 2016 11:50:06 GMT
As a EE, seeing 10MW made in one part of the ship and consumed by, of all things, a railgun at a different part of the ship is making me wonder if we are missing at least one of a few BIG limiting components: 1) Power electronics. A good DC-DC converter is in the 1-10MW/ton range, and rejects 5-20% of its power as heat not that far above 300K. This says to me this would become incredibly burdensome without shifting to a different power transfer paradigm. 2) Power wiring. This actually may be less of an issue for 2 reasons: high temperature wire sensitive to oxidation (eg. tungsten) can be used without much regard to self-heating, and sufficient insulation can provide high voltage transmission. Still, transferring 10MW at voltages typical of what is on Earth (480V is popular for safety and other reasons) results in a nontrivial current (20,000A). Assuming what I said is true (I can dig up some more exact numbers and reputable sources if desired), thoughts on this aspect? I am torn between "this is the Achilles's heel of the high power warships" and "too much detail, too much making things lame". For my own role playing I explain these problems away by assuming near future room temperature superconductors (2) and blaming the obscene power use of the turrets on the power electronics inefficencies (1)
|
|
|
Post by lawson on Oct 21, 2016 8:11:53 GMT
1) like current high power generators, the CoDE generators would be designed with multiple taps and sections that could be wired up in series and parallel to optimally serve the biggest loads.
2) Probably run wiring at 10-100kV or more. Everyone is fine with a 200GW thermal nuclear rocket engines running within 10 degrees of meltdown, A little high voltage is a minor risk in comparison!
|
|